Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhu Bangzao Tuesday night gave a full account of the recent mid-air collision between US and Chinese military planes, and stated China's stance on the incident.

Zhu said that on the morning of April 1, a US EP-3 electronic surveillance plane flew southeast of China's Hainan Island. At 8:36 Beijing time, the US  surveillance plane approached the airspace over China's territorial waters off the city of Sanya to conduct reconnaissance. The Chinese Navy sent two F-8 fighters to follow and monitor the US plane. At 9:07, the Chinese planes made a normal flight in an area 104 kilometers from the baseline of China’s territorial waters. The course of the Chinese planes was at 110 degrees, and the US plane was flying parallel with the right side of the Chinese planes in the same direction.

The US plane suddenly veered at a wide angle towards the Chinese planes, which were closer to baseline of the Chinese side. The US plane's nose and left wing rammed the tail of one of the Chinese planes, causing it to lose control and plunge into the sea. The pilot Wang Wei made parachuted from his stricken plane, while the other Chinese plane returned safely and landed at 9:23. The US plane entered Chinese airspace without approval, and landed at Lingshui Airport in Hainan at 9:33. The Chinese side made proper arrangements for the 24 crew members aboard, in the spirit of humanitarianism.

After the incident, relevant Chinese departments immediately sent search-and-rescue planes and ships to look for pilot Wang Wei.  President Jiang Zemin is deeply concerned about Wang's safety and has instructed time and again to search for and rescue him at any cost. Up till 14:00 hours April 3, a total 37 planes and 29 boats had been sent to collision area. The search and rescue mission is still going on.

It should be pointed out that it was proper and in accordance with international law for Chinese military fighters to follow and monitor the US military surveillance plane within airspace over China's exclusive economic waters.

By veering and ramming the Chinese jet at a wide angle in violation of the flight rules, the US surveillance caused the crash of the Chinese jet. The surveillance flight conducted by the US aircraft overran the scope of "free over-flight" according to international law. The move also violated the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which stipulates that any flight in airspace above another nation's exclusive economic zone should respect the rights of the country concerned. Thus, the US plane's actions posed a serious threat to the national security of China. Meanwhile, such an action was also against the consensus reached by the two countries in May last year on avoiding risky military actions in sea areas. According to the consensus, when military airborne vehicles encounter each other in international airspace, both sides should properly observe the current international law and practices, and take into consideration the flight safety of the other side so as to avoid dangerous approaches and possible collisions.  It should also be pointed out that after the incident the US surveillance plane intrude China's airspace and landed at a Chinese airport without permission from the Chinese side, a move that further violated the regulations set forth by international and Chinese law, thus constituting a gross encroachment upon China's sovereignty and territorial airspace.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry lodged a solemn representation and protest to the US government on April 1 concerning the US plane's act of clashing into the Chinese warplane and infringing upon China's sovereignty and airspace. The Foreign Ministry has pointed out that the US should bear full responsibility for the incident, and demanded that the US government make an explanation to the Chinese government and people on the US plane's actions. China also demanded that the US take effective measures to prevent such an incident from recurring. The Chinese Foreign Ministry lodged a solemn representation once again on April 2.

In response to statements from the U.S. side in recent days, Zhu stressed the following points:

First, the US military surveillance plane violated the principle of "free over-flight," because the incident incurred by the US plane happened in airspace near China's coastal areas and China's exclusive economic waters. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and general international law, all countries enjoy the freedom of over-flight in the exclusive economic waters of a nation. However, the Convention and general international law stipulate at the same time that the rights of the coastal country should be considered.  The US surveillance plane's reconnaissance acts were targeted at China in the airspace over China's coastal area and its flight was far beyond the scope of "over-flight", and thus abused the principle of over-flight freedom. The US plane's action also posed a serious threat to China's security interests, hence it was right for the Chinese military planes to monitor the US spy plane for the sake of China's state security. The US plane, in violation of flight rules, caused the crash, so the US side should bear full responsibility for the incident.

Second, it was illegal for the US military surveillance plane to enter China's territorial space and to land at a Chinese airport without China's approval. The US plane's action has constituted an infringement upon China's sovereignty and territorial space. According to international law and relevant Chinese laws, China enjoys sovereignty over its territorial space.  According to the 12th article of the Law on China's Territorial Waters and Their Contiguous Areas, foreign aircraft may enter the airspace over China's territorial waters only in accordance with agreements or regulations signed between the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the governments of foreign countries. Otherwise, such entry should be approved or accepted by the government of the PRC or its authorized organizations. The 3rd article of the Convention on International Civil Aviation adopted in 1944 clearly states that the military aircraft of a country may not fly over another country's territory or land on its territory without permission. The US military surveillance plane did not issue any request or notice to the Chinese side to enter Chinese airspace or land on Chinese territory during the whole process. (Facts show that after the collision the US plane had the time and technical ability to issue such a request or notice, however the US plane failed to do so.)  By entering China's airspace and landing at a Chinese airport without informing the Chinese side, the US plane has violated the relevant regulations of international conventions and Chinese laws, and its actions constituted serious infringements upon China's sovereignty and airspace.

Third,  it is a fact that the US surveillance plane rammed the Chinese warplane. After the collision, the front part of the nose of the US jet dropped off, and the airscrew of its second left engine was deformed, evidence that the US plane veered into, approached and collided abruptly with the Chinese plane, which can not be denied. The US side  should face up to the facts, bear full responsibility, apologize to China, and not seek any excuse to shirk its responsibility.

Fourth, either according to international law or Chinese domestic laws, China has the right to investigate the plane which caused all this trouble, and the incident as a whole, as China is the victim, the country where the incident occurred and the country where the culprit aircraft landed. Taking into consideration the suddenness and complexity of the incident, China needs sufficient time to make the investigation. Even under such circumstances, the Chinese Foreign Ministry still called in the US ambassador to China, and lodged a representation with him at 9:30 pm on the evening of the day the incident took place.

It also needs to be pointed out that the US plane is not a civilian aircraft, but a military spy plane that illegally entered Chinese territory, violated both international and Chinese domestic laws, and posed a serious threat to Chinese sovereignty and airspace. The US spy plane entered China illegally, differing from the aircraft that enters China in accordance with the law, can not enjoy immunity.  The Chinese side reserves the right to lodge further representations in line with the investigation results.

Fifth, the most urgent matter for the US side is not to table all manner of requests, but to make a thorough review on the incident, apologize to the Chinese side and respond to China's concerns and demands. The Chinese government and people have the right to know the answers to the following questions:
Why does the US side frequently send its military surveillance planes on spy flights over sea areas close to China?
Why did the US warplane make an abrupt turn and ram the Chinese jet in violation of operation rules?
Why did the US plane intrude into China's airspace and land at a Chinese airport without approval from the Chinese side?
The US is fully responsible for making a clear explanation of the above questions to the Chinese people.

At present, the Chinese side is conducting an investigation into the incident. Although the process is not yet complete, China lost no time in allowing US diplomats in China to meet the US plane crew members in question, after taking into consideration humanitarian concerns and the relevant agreements between China and the US. This demonstrates China's sincerity and humanitarian spirit in handling the issue. China will deal properly with the US crew and plane in accordance with the law and the results of the investigation.

Zhu once again demanded that the US side seriously consider China's solemn representations and rational requests, and sincerely cooperate with China in the investigation.  He also urged the US side to make a prompt explanation to the Chinese government and people about the US plane's ramming of the Chinese jet and its infringement upon China's sovereignty and airspace, apologize to the Chinese side and bear all the responsibilities arising from the incident.